Sully Page #4
and I can tell you the only reason
the plane operated as well as it did...
that the aircraft could land anywhere...
is because Captain Sullenberger turned on
the exhilarate power unit.
He was simply following the QRH.
No, no he wasn't.
He wasn't following proper procedure at all.
And I know because I had the QRH in my hands.
He switched on the APU immediately after
engine blowback.
According to the Airbus that's the 15th thing
on the list to do. 15th!
If he had followed the damn rules,
we'd all be dead.
Maybe that's the part you don't like.
You're not used to having answers to your guesses.
Look, look, look. What Jeff is saying is that I know the AR320...
what it does, and what it does it do.
I have read countless CVR transcripts
of deceased pilots...
and I have significant accident
investigation experience.
There's no question that you're a talented,
dedicated, experienced professional.
And all fledge of pilots before January 15th...
and every crash you investigated are not the purview
of this investigation. Only US Airways 1549 matters today.
Your Union has been advised, ACARS data relate that the
left engine continued to turn throughout the flight.
Then the ACARS data is wrong...
The evidence shows that the left engine was at Idle
or Sub-Idle immediately following the bird strike.
You show me the left engine,
I'll show you dead birds and no power...
the left engine was lost in the crash,
due to excessive damage on touchdown.
We can circle back to that later.
Let's just assume, that it was as you say,
a dual engine loss, do to bird strike.
Your weight was 151.510 pounds,
wind and temperature, N-NW, 21 degrees...
speed and altitude 200 nods and 2818 feet.
Agreed?
Correct.
We were able to run the all algorithms
and the resulting...
the computer simulations of US Airways Flight 1549
showed that the Aviation Engineers were correct.
There was enough altitude and speed after the
bird strike for a successful return to LaGuardia.
Successful?
The plane landed at LaGuardia intact, undamaged.
You got that from one computer simulation?
No, 20.
Including attempts made for Teterboro runways 19
and LaGuardia runways 22 and 13.
Every Computer simulation with the exact
flight parameters demonstrated...
that return to LaGuardia was possible.
And not just possible, probable.
Does anyone here needed further
computer evidence?
Captain Sullenberger?
First Officer Skiles?
Not at this time. I would like to go over
the parameters that were used.
- We'll make them available at the Union.
- Thank you.
And once the Investigation is complete...
we'll be able to share the actual
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Sully" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 29 Apr. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/sully_19081>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In