Tranceformer - A Portrait of Lars von Trier

---

I'll gladly assert

that everything

said or written of me is a lie.

Four...five...six...

But a provocation's purpose

is to get people to think.

Seven...eight...

If you subject people

to a provocation

you allow them the possibility

of their own interpretation.

Ten...

He is a, what can one say...

...a playful rascal.

Absolute opponent to all kinds

of intellectual authority.

Unfortunately, I have

a "troll shard" in my eye.

I don't know if you know

The Snow Queen by Han Andersen.

I remember there's a boy who

at some stage gets

a troll shard in his eye

and sees things as ugly.

I see you as fairly cross-eyed.

His name alone is

a pure provocation...

Von Trier! It's incredible

how many doors

have opened through it.

That's because my own life is

a fabrication, not so?

Shall we skip the niceties and

get on with the interview?

He's very bourgeois.

Wears slippers at home,

runs around the lawn,

cuts the hedge.

Nothing could be more dull.

There's nothing exotic about him.

About being "self-directed".

That means you direct yourself

differently in a certain way.

I don't do that.

You normally associate extremism

with grand gestures and so on.

But Lars is very controlled,

very amiable in his way.

That means that sometimes

you don't even notice

the missiles he fires.

And the whole thing blows up

without you really knowing

what happened.

Danish bastards!

Danish bastards!

But life is a circus,

for God's sake...

My mother gave me

a small-gauge camera.

Actually she had really

bought it for herself

but she thought

I should play with it.

I think this is my second film.

The first was more experimental.

The camera was more capable of

single frames and dissolves

and everything...It was fun and

everything had to be tested.

And this really arty film...

Later there are also examples of...

Well, double exposures

at any rate...

And even hand-held camera and...

subjective images.

It is actually largely a textbook

in different film styles.

I was about 10 or 12 years old.

I made him swim there.

I remember he got scolded

for being soaked.

He had his nice clothes on.

What's interesting

and what I later...

It's interesting to see

I realized how to use

interior film for exteriors.

It was one of the most important

color manipulations for 8 mm.

It means...There's interior film

used on a daylight scene.

There's a sequence shortly that's

shot outside on interior film.

It's in a second if I remember...

It makes him more acidic,

you could say...

Here's a tracking shot.

Taken from a bicycle.

My biggest dream at that time

was to build a camera crane.

I never did.

It was too difficult.

It had to be built of wood...

15 years later he has

the resources

and in The Element of Crime

he creates an unusually

expressive thriller.

He wins a prize in Cannes.

It's the first part of a trilogy

about a Europe in disintegration.

In these films,

Lars von Trier transforms reality

and evokes closed, hypnotic

worlds of rare suggestiveness.

The resources for Epidemic

are more limited

but the film imagination

is unbound.

Within the tightly composed

images of Europa,

chaos reigns which inexorably

condemns people,

both good and evil,

to ruination.

In 1968,

Trier plays the leading role

in a SwedishlDanish TV series,

Clandestine Summer.

He is 12 years old.

I'm no millionaire.

My mother will go mad

if I steal the marmalade.

-Buy some.

-I'm saving for a tape recorder.

-Whilst I starve to death?

-0kay, I'll fetch something, then.

His parents, Ulf and Inger Trier,

radical middle class academics

believe in an upbringing

free of rules and restraint

where Lars himself

can decide over his life.

That's to say,

Lars' reference milieu

was sort of culturally radical,

progressive, communist,

Scandinavian

with a little Jewish, Copenhagen,

international character.

It was that which he primarily,

as I saw it anyway,

revolted against in his own

timid but radical,

in another sense of radical,

totally extreme manner.

No, I had a very,

very free upbringing.

And according to me,

it was too free

as it is such a cause

of anxieties.

What happens when you give

someone complete freedom, is...

The child has to be

its own authority.

When there's no one to say:

Do this or that,

go to the dentist, go to bed,

they have to be

their own authority.

And the difficulties that arise

simply going to bed

were incredibly traumatic for me.

It's still a common problem

for some.

It's a lot for a little kid

to decide for himself,

I missed the love an authority

that defines parameters can bring.

Because that is a form of love.

Yes, but school was pure hell for

me. It was a very strict school.

It coincided in that I'd always

been allowed to do what I wanted

and then I came to a school where

you primarily had to sit still.

Which I still think

is completely crazy.

I can't reconcile myself to it.

It's idiotic.

Why should you sit still

at your desk for eight years?

It's an entirely idiotic

principle, isn't it?

And I was badly treated,

I was bullied by the pupils

and I was scared to go out

at breaktime

as I was so badly treated.

I hated every hour because I was

forced to be inside. It was awful.

So eventually

I came to the conclusion

which was what I'd learnt

as a child, namely,

avoid what ails you.

That meant I left

and you couldn't really

Rate this script:0.0 / 0 votes