Is Genesis History? Page #3
and then quickly they eroded.
Steve wanted to show ...
... where in the floodwaters struck first continental crust,
so he took me to a deeper place in the canyon.
Steve, when you said to me ...
... would you take to the bottom, you were kidding, right?
We are in the bottom, right?
We are in a great side canyon of the Grand Canyon main ...
... and we are seeing the granite base,
which is the core of the continental crust, so to speak,
and then we see the above flat layers.
The boundary between granite rock below ...
... and Tapeats sandstone above is ...
... this area we call the Great nonconformity.
Why does it seem to be such a definite line?
I mean, it is very clear.
I think it is an erosional limit colossal scale.
We are seeing something that shows the magnitude ...
... flood flow over a surface.
And you're just here?
Great Dissatisfaction extends continentally.
I've seen, I think, in the Middle East.
It is in Europe.
It is in Africa.
And it is here under the North American continental crust.
So we have this layer.
How thick is this layer?
What follows from this?
Well, here we have the megasequence Sauk ...
... thousand feet of sandstone, shale,
limestone covering the entire continental crust.
There are four other large packages sequences ...
... strata that are on it.
These are also continuous as this.
What we are seeing here is fairly representative ...
... the rest of the world.
Makes one really question the notion ...
... that all this happened for a small local flooding.
We're talking about something huge.
The power of moving water was beveling ...
... and pulverizing rock, depositing a thick layer ...
... and leading us to think in a global flood.
However, the conventional story is completely different.
He says there is a long time ...
... between each of the layers.
Some people have said that the limit of the Great Dissatisfaction ...
... it represents five hundred million years.
You mean between the granite we see ...
... and that first layer of sedimentary rock?
Yes. They say there could be five hundred million years,
and that's what his explanation ...
... in the history of the Earth I would ask them to consider,
and yet, when you come here and look at this ...
... it is almost a regular flat surface.
Not exactly a flat surface,
but it is a surface that undulates gently.
Would that be the product of thousands of millions of years ...
... or the product of the power of water ...
... brushing a surface?
Here time is alien for a good explanation,
so we want to explain what we see.
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Is Genesis History?" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 28 Apr. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/is_genesis_history_10982>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In