Food, Inc. Page #3
and they're just not
gonna complain.
The companies like
these kind of workers.
It doesn't matter
if the chickens get sick.
All of the chickens
will go to the plant
for processing.
The companies keep
because of the debt
that the farmers have.
is anywhere from $280,000
to $300,000 per house.
And once you make
your initial investment,
the companies
constantly come back
with demands
of upgrades
for new equipment,
and the grower
has no choice.
They have to do it
or you're threatened
with loss of a contract.
This is how they keep
It's how they keep them
spending money,
going to the bank
and borrowing more money.
The debt just
keeps building.
To have no say
in your business,
it's degrading.
It's like being
a slave to the company.
The idea that you would
need to write a book
telling people
where their food came from
is just a sign of how far removed
we've become.
It seems to me that we're entitled
to know about our food--
"Who owns it?
How are they making it?
Can I have a look
in the kitchen?"
When I wanted to understand
the industrial food system,
what I set about doing
was very simple.
I wanted to trace
the source of my food.
When you go through
the supermarket,
what looks like this cornucopia
There is an illusion
of diversity.
There are only
a few companies involved
and there're
only a few crops involved.
What really
surprised me most
as I followed that food
back to its source,
I kept ending up
in the same place,
and that was
a cornfield in Iowa.
So much of our
industrial food
turns out to be clever
rearrangements of corn.
Corn has conquered the world
in a lot of ways.
It is a remarkable plant.
a farmer in America
could grow maybe 20 bushels of corn
on an acre.
Today, 200 bushels
is no problem.
That's an astonishing
achievement
for which breeders
deserve credit,
for which fertilizer
makers deserve credit,
all deserve credit.
That's largely driven
by government policy,
government policy that,
in effect,
allows us to produce corn
below the cost of production.
we're paid to overproduce,
and it was caused by
these large
multinational interests.
The reason our government's
promoting corn--
the Cargills, the ADMs,
Tyson, Smithfield--
they have an interest in purchasing corn
below the cost of production.
They use that interest and that
extensive amount of money they have
to lobby Congress to give us the kind
of farm bills we now have.
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Food, Inc." Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 7 May 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/food,_inc._8384>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In