A Civil Action Page #3
- PG-13
- Year:
- 1998
- 115 min
- 5,599 Views
You get fined,
you pay it and carry on.
If you're gonna knock a guy down,
do it so he can't get up again.
What are you looking for
with this suit?
Obviously, we're seeking
compensation for the families
and punitive damages for wilful
negligence by these companies.
But is that what
this is about - money?
- No.
- Is that what matters most?
- No.
- It's about this.
And this.
And this.
Yeah.
Yeah, I know, we have
no feelings, no compassion,
no empathy for
our clients' suffering.
Can I say something?
What does that
have to do with anything?
The lawyer who shares
his client's pain
does his client
such a grave disservice
he should have his licence
It clouds his judgement,
and that's as useful
as a doctor
who's frightened of blood.
All rise.
This court is now in session.
The Honourable
Walter J Skinner presiding.
Is this the only case?
This is a lot of lawyers.
Sit down.
You're looking well.
The Red Sox must be in first place.
Roger Clemens
is the answer to my prayers.
You have some interest in this case?
I'm a co-defendant, but it's not
my motion. It's Foley-Hoag's.
- And that motion?
- Your Honour.
- I'm Jan Schlichtmann.
- I know. Sit down.
The matter before us seems simple.
- Your Honour, it isn't.
- May I hear it?
The intention here is to place me
under a cloud of impropriety.
- Really?
- Yes. What they're saying
is that they know law and I don't,
they're real lawyers and I'm not.
They're just trying to humiliate me.
You are a personal injury lawyer,
aren't you? I think you'll survive.
- See? It's starting already.
- No, you've started already.
I'm on the defensive,
they're the defendants.
Do you think
I might hear this motion
before You explain to ME
what it's really about?
- Of course.
- Thank you.
Now, Mr...Cheeseman, is it?
Your motion to dismiss
is based on?
Rule 11, Your Honour.
Specifically that Mr Schlichtmann had
no evidential grounds
only his knowledge that W.R. Grace
Corporation has a lot of money.
Not true.
He performed no real investigation,
did no research of any consequence,
except perhaps
And he's prepared his complaint
so inexpertly as to render it moot.
- All untrue.
- Do you know what Rule 11 is?
To be honest, Your Honour,
I had to look it up.
I'll be honest, so did l.
Do you know why, Mr Cheeseman?
Because it is so old and ambiguous
few lawyers
waste their time with it, or mine.
It's a non-issue, Mr Cheeseman.
Your motion is denied. Thank you.
Thank you.
- Anything else?
- No, Your Honour.
Set a trial date.
Excuse me, Mr Facher.
I'd like to thank you.
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"A Civil Action" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 3 May 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/a_civil_action_5625>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In