Did Darwin Kill God Page #2
- Year:
- 2009
- 140 Views
That would not have occurred to them.
They'd have asked, "What is the truth that God wants
to communicate to us in this text or that text?"
So we need myth on occasion
to communicate complex truths?
Mythological speech
is often the only kind
we can use to talk
about important things in life.
So this approach to truth,
this approach to scriptures
is not a modern anomaly,
or invention, it's what the church
has always been about?
That's the position of the Church.
Reading Genesis as myth and metaphor
is not a modern trend.
This has always been the
mainstream view, this is orthodoxy.
And we see it clearly in one of the most influential
thinkers in all of Christian history, Saint Augustine.
Writing in the fifth century,
helpfully entitled
The Literal Meaning Of Genesis.
For Augustine, the authors of Genesis were
trying to communicate unfathomable events.
How do you communicate the beginning
of existence or time itself?
This meant we had to use
different modes of communication.
Augustine even warns Christians
against treating Genesis,
or the Bible, as science or literal,
saying they'd be ridiculed
for talking nonsense.
If we take the Bible only literally,
we will have an impoverished
account, not a richer one,
and there will be no room
for theological reflection.
Saint Augustine has another and almost prescient
point to make about the creation of life.
He wrote that God is not temporal,
and it is only for us, being a part
of the process, that time exists.
He says that life involves a process of
realisation through the course of time.
He tells us that,
over time, life evolves.
And many of the Church Fathers
echoed his views.
This is not to say that Augustine
but if we were to tell him
about this today,
he would be wholly unperturbed.
When we read what the early Fathers
of the Church wrote about the Bible,
it's clear it stands at the heart of
Christianity, not as a science textbook,
but as
a communication of God's nature,
and the reason for existence.
For them,
God was not an armchair God
who sat outside of his creation
watching it unfold,
but nor was it a deity
who intervenes arbitrarily.
Rather, God was seen
as ever-present in all creation.
This was, and remains,
the view of orthodox Christianity,
a view that would be completely
compatible with Darwin's theory.
But, of course, Christians
have not always remembered this,
and over the centuries, there have
been some who read Genesis literally.
The most significant took place in the
I've returned to England, for in Westminster Abbey
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Did Darwin Kill God" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 26 Apr. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/did_darwin_kill_god_6893>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In