The Unbelievers Page #2
and I know rather
little else about him,
I'm afraid.
And he is sometimes talked about
as a possible candidate
for pope.
I have always refused to debate
religious fundamentalists.
It is my understanding
that a cardinal of
is not a fundamentalist.
If he is, I've made a mistake.
We're very excited to have these
two gentlemen here this evening
for this discussion.
We know them already.
Please let us introduce
them properly
and make them feel very welcome.
Please help me welcome
the author of the God delusion,
the evolutionary biologist
Richard Dawkins.
...the archbishop of Sydney,
please welcome
cardinal George pell.
Five, four, three...
George pell,
do you accept that
humans evolved from apes?
Yeah, probably.
From neanderthals, yes.
From neanderthals?
Probably.
Why from neanderthals?
Who else would you suggest?
Neanderthals were our cousins.
We're not descended from them.
These extant cousins?
Where would I find
a neanderthal today
if they're my cousins?
They're not extant.
They're extinct.
That's my point.
Your point is that
because they're not...
That because they're extant,
they can't be our cousins?
I'm really am not much fussed.
That's very clear.
Ignoring the limitations
of science
also leads to sloppy
and arbitrary science.
A good example is the field
of quantum mechanics.
The evidence of logic
derives from the evidence
of reality.
Is it logical that I can be
in two places at once? No.
But if I am an electron,
I certainly can be.
Because while you refer
to quantum mechanics,
I actually understand it.
Most evolutionary
biologists today
don't believe that.
Don't believe what?
They don't believe in
this crude fundamentalist
version of random selection
that you propose.
I do not propose it,
and I strongly deny
that evolution is
random selection.
This idea that we should
challenge our beliefs,
I agree in some areas,
and this is the point
the difference between
science and religion...
Only when you appreciate
the difference can you
ascertain whether
different propositions
apply or not.
morality, for example,
do you want me to challenge
that murder is wrong?
Well, if any of you
stopped believing in God,
I would ask you,
would you go out tomorrow
and murder your neighbor?
Well, some of you say yes.
Evolution is
non-random selection.
Oh, there's a purpose
to it, is there?
No.
But...
Could you explain
what "non-random" means?
Yes, of course I could.
That's my life's work.
No idea should be
above ridicule.
Ridicule is a very
important tool.
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"The Unbelievers" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 24 Apr. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/the_unbelievers_21538>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In